Tag: Land Use Ordinance

Excavation set to begin despite appeal. Why?

Excavation planning enters high gear on October 7, 2020, with Tyler Smith on site to ensure complete elimination of the historic scenic view corridor along Central Street in Rockport.

While the citizens’ appeal of the Planning Board approval for the proposed hotel is still in the offing (stay tuned for exact date and time), the developer appears willing to risk their own money to begin excavation work on the long vacant site (including the historic view corridor by the Shepherd Block). Continuing their disregard for the Rockport Land Use Ordinance, the developer seems sure their connections (and money) will see them through the appeal without change. You can help prove them wrong by donating today.

As you can see from these photos taken on Wednesday, October 7, 2020, Tyler Smith, representative of 20 Central, LLC (the developer) is planning demolition of the 18 Central Oyster Bar & Grill patio and excavation of the site to pave the way for their planned hotel. Of course, if we win the appeal they will have to restore the land to its current condition at their own cost. Winning the appeal is no certainty, and your anonymous donation, no matter how much, helps and sends a message.

We can use your support, both by being present through letters and attendance (if that is even possible) and your financial support. Please donate here as so many of your neighbors already have. Any amount helps, just use the drop down menu on our secure site. This groundswell of citizen support should mean something in the process, at least as much as the connections that got this approved in the first place. We may not stop their excavation, but we can make them pay for it and put it back how they found it!

Tyler Smith, representative of 20 Central, LLC, the developer, is pleased to be getting started eliminating the scenic views from Central Street, Goodrich Park, and the Shepherd Block.
Tyler Smith, developer representative, pleased to be entirely eliminating your scenic view.
Tyler Smith, developer representative, pleased with his work planning the excavation to eliminate most of your scenic view for their planned 'boutique hotel.'
The arrogance of the project personified.

Those citizen’s initiatives postcards

A review of two postcards received by Rockport residents regarding the Citizen’s Initiatives, one from the Friends of Rockport and the other anonymously.

You likely received two postcards recently about the upcoming Rockport Town Meeting and the Citizen’s Initiatives. The first mailing focused entirely on the Citizen’s Initiatives, Article 3 and Article 4 (Learn more here: Article 3 and Article 4). You may have noticed that it was not claimed by any organization or person, it was anonymous. Then you received one from the Friends of Rockport, your local, citizen based, non-profit seeking to preserve our community. Let’s consider them separately:

The Friends of Rockport postcard:

  • The postcard (and the links above) helps you better understand the issues and implications of the Citizen’s Initiatives. They share with you drawings of the proposed hotel and a 20-room alternative which preserves the view, still adds to the tax base, and continues revitalization of the harbor area.
  • The Citizen’s Initiatives have over 300 certified Rockport resident signatures.
  • The remaining Articles are put forth by the five member Select Board, and not seen or reviewed by citizens beyond a Select Board meeting discussion. We particularly suggest you consider this Article 6 and Article 9.

The anonymous postcard:

  • Suggests that the Citizen’s Initiatives are an attempt “to stop a downtown Rockport boutique hotel.” They are not, they are meant to help the town stay true to its character, including the developer living up to their word on a 20-22 room hotel and following the Land Use Ordinance, Architectural Review Standards. Those standards state “…Structures shall impede as little as reasonably practical, scenic views from the main road or from existing structures or nearby undeveloped areas.” and “The architectural design of structures and their materials and colors shall be visually harmonious with the overall appearance of neighboring structures.”
  • Suggests “out of state VRBO owners” are behind the Citizen’s Initiatives. You now know that to be untrue, over 300 residents signed those petitions.
  • States that the five person Select Board opinions and recommendations are somehow better for the town than the 300 plus residents and your opinion.

Simply put:

  • Central St. view, Proposed Hotel
    This?
  • A 20 room alternative design retaining the scenic view and with architecture consistent with neighboring buildings.
    Or, this?

Learn more about this here: https://www.penbaypilot.com/article/we-hope-you-will-consider-our-rockport-recommendations-neighbors-fellow-citizens/136954

Select Board comments about the postcards on July 27, 2020:

  • Debra Hall at 7:07 in the meeting states “… The idea … that an ordinance can be passed allowing for a hotel, that someone can purchase property with those ordinances in mind, … and then to have another bite at the apple, …. That is offensive to me, it continues to be offensive to me, it will always be offensive to me.” Of course we know from the timeline that the land was purchased when hotels were not allowed in the downtown district, and the developer pushed for the ordinance change by proposing a 20-22 room hotel.
  • Denise Munger at 8:26 in the meeting states “... This petition adjusts the number of hotel rooms, it does not reduce the size of the hotel. The Hotel will still be allowed, even if Article 4 were passed, to stay end-t0-end between the two buildings. It would just result in larger hotel rooms, um. So, I think it’s important for people to understand. ….” Of course we know from the Land Use Ordinance section 1003.Architectural Review Standards that a hotel compliant with the ordinance would “…impede as little as reasonably practical, scenic views from the main road or from existing structures and nearby undeveloped areas.” The current proposal does none of these, eliminating the windows on the Shepherd Block Westerly wall and entirely blocking the view from the main street and Goodridge Park.