Article 6 proposes a change to the Land Use Ordinance section 803.1 Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards. The new language is:
“The purpose of this Section is to provide for adequate off-street parking spaces to meet the needs of the use or structure. The off-street parking shall provide sufficient spaces to minimize the need for on-street parking.”
The proposed language (a Yes vote on Article 6) eliminates the current language “all new construction, alterations and changes of use, there shall be provided off-street parking and loading space adequate for their use.” Essentially meaning ‘you need not meet the parking requirements, if you ‘minimize’ the use of on-street parking.’ Vote “NO” on Article 6.
A “YES” vote on Article 6 delivers this broad, subjective language to a current Planning Board with a track record of using subjectivity to favor developers over the greater good of Rockport. Vote “NO” on Article 6.
A “YES” vote on Article 6 also approves an important new provision in the proposed language regarding off-site parking is “…may be located at a separate location subject to the approval of the CEO (Chief Enforcement Officer) or Planning Board.” In other words, off-site parking can happen without a public hearing! Vote “NO” on Article 6.
A “YES” vote on Article 6 hypothetically paves the way for developers to build on property which provides off-street parking today, like the parking behind the Shepherd Block and Union Hall. Given the Planning Board’s willingness to disregard the Land Use Ordinance scenic view provisions, you can imagine a new building rising behind Mary Lea Park. The Select Board will simply say ‘there’s a great view right down on Beauchamp Point.’ Vote “NO” on Article 6.
A “YES” vote on Article 6 would allow developers to provide remote parking for guests by operating “transit buses” or “valet parking” services through our streets instead of providing parking on site or within reasonable walking distance as currently required. (803.5). Vote “NO” on Article 6.
A “YES” vote on Article 6 would completely eliminate all requirements relating to the Town’s upgrading of public way, including giving notice to those residents whose homes abut the project! (803.4). Vote “NO” on Article 6.